From the National Park Service and Dickinson College

Author: Cooper Wingert Page 5 of 38

(1853) William Thomas Rescue

Vigilance leaders charge federal officers with assault and battery under Pennsylvania state law, impeding enforcement of the federal 1850 Fugitive Slave Act


Date(s): escaped federal custody September 3, 1853

Location(s): Fauquier County, Virginia; Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania

Outcome: Freedom

Summary:

downtown engraving of center of Wilkes barre, tall buidlings with steeples and cupolas

Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania House Divided Project)

Virginia slave catchers had the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act on their side, but knew they still had to tread carefully in Pennsylvania, where antislavery vigilance forces could rally powerful local opposition to fugitive slave renditions. Slave catchers and three US deputy marshals traveled to Wilkes Barre undercover and stayed overnight in the hotel where their target, freedom seeker William Thomas, was working as a waiter. The next morning, the Virginians and federal officers ambushed Thomas in the dining room while he served breakfast. But Thomas grabbed a carving knife and fought back. Local residents and the local sheriff, William Palmer, refused to help officers secure Thomas. After a bloodied Thomas escaped, local residents and vigilance leaders in Philadelphia charged the three US deputy marshals, George Wynkoop, John Jenkins, and John Cresson, with assault and battery under Pennsylvania state law. The three federal officers were in and out of state jail until the charges were finally dismissed in May 1854. But US district court judge John Kane remained worried that if federal officers enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act were “compelled constantly to suffer and combat with annoyances like this,” few would be willing to enforce the controversial legislation in the future.


Related Sources


Related Essays

(1854) Anthony Burns Rendition

US troops return freedom seeker Anthony Burns to slavery from Boston on June 2. The federal government’s controversial tactics turn more Northerners against the Fugitive Slave Act. Boston abolitionists later purchase Burns’s freedom, and Burns attends Oberlin College in Ohio before moving to Canada as a preacher.

[This post is still under construction, more forthcoming in 2023]

(1854) Kansas-Nebraska Act

Citation

1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act, May 30, 1854, FULL TEXT via National Archives


Excerpt

cartoon man lying down mouth open

Political cartoon attacking the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act (Library of Congress)

SECTION 32. And be it further enacted, … That the Constitution, and all laws of the United States which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the same force and effect within the said Territory of Kansas as elsewhere within the United States, except the eighth section of the act preparatory to the admission of Missouri into the Union, approved March sixth, eighteen hundred and twenty, which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-intervention by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories, as recognized by the legislation of eighteen hundred and fifty, commonly called the Compromise Measures, is hereby declared inoperative and void; it being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States


Related Sources


Related Essays

(1854) St. Louis Stampedes

Nearly 40 enslaved people liberate themselves in a pair of “slave stampedes” from St. Louis in October and November.

[This post is still under construction, more forthcoming in 2023]

(1854) Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court defies federal authority and declares the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act unconstitutional in July. The US Supreme Court later reverses the Wisconsin court ruling in 1859 in Abelman v. Booth.

[This post is still under construction, more forthcoming in 2023]

(1855) Jane Johnson Escape

Slaveholders’ attempt to punish abolitionists involved in Jane Johnson’s escape backfires, landing abolitionist Passmore Williamson in prison but making him an antislavery martyr


Date(s): escaped July 18, 1855

Location(s): Philadelphia

Outcome: Freedom

Summary:

woman with earrings, engraving

Jane Johnson (House Divided Project)

North Carolinian John Wheeler had just been appointed the new US ambassador to a rump proslavery government in Nicaragua, and he intended to bring three enslaved people along with him: Jane Johnson and her two sons, Daniel (aged around 10-11) and Isaiah (aged around six to seven). The diplomat planned to travel through Washington, DC and Philadelphia, en route to New York City, where he would board a ship for Nicaragua. But Wheeler knew that traveling through the North with enslaved people was risky. Many Northern states denied slaveholders the right of sojourn (to hold enslaved people as property while visiting), and the federal 1850 Fugitive Slave Act only applied to enslaved people who escaped, not those brought north with their slaveholder’s consent. As a result, Wheeler forbade Johnson from speaking to Black people in the Northern cities they were passing through. But Jane Johnson also understood that Northern state laws worked in her favor. Soon after arriving in Philadelphia, Johnson contacted Black hotel workers who alerted Philadelphia’s antislavery vigilance committee. Right before Wheeler’s party was set to disembark for New York, vigilance leaders Passmore Williamson and William Still boarded the boat and escorted Jane and her two children back to shore over Ambassador Wheeler’s angry protests. Unable to reenslave Johnson and her children, Wheeler and US authorities targeted the Underground Railroad activists who helped her escape. Wheeler pressed charges against Still and five Black dockworkers for assault and battery, but Johnson (now free by state law) returned to Philadelphia and testified on their behalf. Johnson’s deposition that she left willingly and was not forced by Still and others helped lead to the Black activists’ acquittal. Federal district court judge John Kane was unable to convict Passmore Williamson under the federal fugitive slave law, but did find the abolitionist guilty of contempt of court. Instead of deterring future Underground Railroad activism, however, Williamson’s three-month prison sentence for contempt of court made him a martyr for the movement.

engraving, rescue scene, people tussling by side of boat

1855 rescue of Jane Johnson and her children in Philadelphia (House Divided Project)


Related Resources

Jane Johnson’s deposition reprinted in William Still, The Underground Railroad (1872), 94-95, [WEB]

Abolitionist Passmore Williamson’s account published as Narrative of the Facts in the case of Passmore Williamson (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Society, 1855), [WEB]

Cartoon depicting Johnson’s escape published as The Follies of the Age, Vive La Humbug! Lithograph. (Philadelphia, ca. 1855), [WEB]

(1855) St. Louis Stampede

St. Louis authorities thwart another attempted “slave stampede” and accuse three free Black residents of involvement in the escape plot, including Mary Meachum.

[This post is still under construction, more forthcoming in 2023]

(1856) Benjamin Drew, A North-Side View of Slavery

Citation

Benjamin Drew, A North-Side View of Slavery: The Refugee, Or the Narratives of Fugitive Slaves in Canada (Boston: Jewett, 1856), FULL TEXT via Documenting the American South


Excerpt

man, beareded, shoulders and head

Abolitionist Benjamin Drew traveled to Canada and interviewed freedom seekers, resulting in an 1856 book (Ohio History Connection)

THE colored population of Upper Canada, was estimated in the First Report of the Anti-Slavery Society of Canada, in 1852, at thirty thousand. Of this large number, nearly all the adults, and many of the children, have been fugitive slaves from the United States; it is, therefore, natural that the citizens of this Republic should feel an interest in their fate and fortunes. Many causes, however, have hitherto prevented the public generally from knowing their exact condition and circumstances. Their enemies, the supporters of slavery, have represented them as “indolent, vicious, and debased; suffering and starving, because they have no kind masters to do the thinking for them, and to urge them to the necessary labor, which their own laziness and want of forecast, lead them to avoid.” Some of their friends, anxious to obtain aid for the comparatively few in number, (perhaps three thousand in all,) who have actually stood in need of assistance, have not, in all cases, been sufficiently discriminating in their statements: old settlers and new, the rich and the poor, the good and the bad, have suffered alike from imputations of poverty and starvation–misfortunes, which, if resulting from idleness, are akin to crimes. Still another set of men, selfish in purpose, have, while pretending to act for the fugitives, found a way to the purses of the sympathetic, and appropriated to their own use, funds intended for supposititious sufferers.

Such being the state of the case, it may relieve some minds from doubt and perplexity, to hear from the refugees themselves, their own opinions of their condition and their wants. These will be found among the narratives which occupy the greater part of the present volume.

Further, the personal experiences of the colored Canadians, while held in bondage in their native land, shed a peculiar lustre on the Institution of the South. They reveal the hideousness of the sin, which, while calling on the North to fall down and worship it, almost equals the tempter himself in the felicity of scriptural quotations.

The narratives were gathered promiscuously from persons whom the author met with in the course of a tour through the cities and settlements of Canada West. While his informants talked, the author wrote: nor are there in the whole volume a dozen verbal alterations which were not made at the moment of writing, while in haste to make the pen become a tongue for the dumb.

Many who furnished interesting anecdotes and personal histories may, perhaps, feel some disappointment because their contributions are omitted in the present work. But to publish the whole, would far transcend the limits of a single volume. The manuscripts, however, are in safe-keeping, and will, in all probability, be given to the world on some future occasion.

For the real names which appear in the manuscripts of the narratives published, it has been deemed advisable, with few exceptions, that letters should be substituted….


Related Essays

(1856) Garner Family Rendition

US authorities recapture freedom seeker Margaret Garner and her family near Cincinnati, Ohio on January 28. Rather than see her family returned to slavery, Garner kills her youngest child before federal officers seize her. The US government eventually returns Garner and her family to slavery under the Fugitive Slave Act, but not before the tragic case shocks more Northerners into speaking out against slavery.

[This post is still under construction, more forthcoming in 2023]

(1857) Addison White Rescue

Abolitionists go unpunished after a dramatic rescue openly defies the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, infuriating slaveholders


Date(s): rescued May 1857

Location(s): Fleming County, Kentucky; Mechanicsburg, Champaign County, Ohio

Outcome: Freedom

Summary:

man seated in jacket with bowtie

Addison White (House Divided Project)

Addison White escaped from northern Kentucky and reached Mechanicsburg, Ohio, where abolitionist Udney Hyde provided him with shelter and employment over the winter of 1856-1857. White chose to remain in central Ohio so he could maintain contact with his wife and children, who had been born free but remained in Kentucky. The freedom seeker dictated his letters to a local abolitionist, Charles Taylor, who postmarked them from nearby Springfield, Ohio in an effort to conceal White’s whereabouts. But their diligence did not pay off. Authorities intercepted the mail and in May 1857 a large posse of slave catchers and US officials appeared at Udney Hyde’s door to arrest White under the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act. White opened fire on the slave catchers while Hyde’s daughter Amanda notified neighbors, who quickly assembled and helped White elude federal officers. Furious US authorities charged Hyde and other Mechanicsburg residents with violating the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, but Ohio state officials in turn arrested some of the federal officers for assaulting a local sheriff. The resulting standoff between federal and state authorities was only resolved when Mechanicsburg residents agreed to purchase White’s freedom for $950. No abolitionists were ever convicted for White’s rescue, further convincing slaveholders that the recent federal law was not enough to discourage Underground Railroad activists. Later during the Civil War, White enlisted in the 54th Massachusetts Infantry. Afterwards, White returned to Mechanicsburg where he lived until his death in 1885.


Related Resources

Gun reportedly given to Addison White by Udney Hyde, Ohio History Connection, [WEB].

Recollection of Amanda (Hyde) Shepherd (abolitionist Udney Hyde’s daughter) dated September 7, 1895, Wilbur H. Siebert Underground Railroad Collection, Ohio History Connection, [WEB]

Narrative by local historian in Benjamin F. Prince, “The Rescue Case of 1857,” published in Ohio Archeological and Historical Publications xvi, (1907), accessible at Wilbur H. Siebert Underground Railroad Collection, Ohio History Connection, [WEB]

Page 5 of 38

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén