US Constitution on Slavery (1787)

No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

INTRODUCTION

1787 Constitution
1787 Constitution (National Archives)

The original US Constitution, adopted in Philadelphia in September 1787 and ratified in the spring of 1788, addressed the issue of slavery in several ways, but never mentioned the word itself even once.  The three clauses below represented the most direct examples of this awkward dance –the so-called three-fifths clause, African slave trade clause, and the fugitive slave clause.   Historians disagree over what that tension illustrated.  Some see it as an example of systemic racism at the core of America’s founding.  Yet others point to the hard fought battle waged by slavery’s opponents in the 1780s and 1790s to limit slavery’s sphere of influence mainly to southern states, clearly in hopes that  all states in the new nation would eventually –and voluntarily– abolish the evil institution.

SOURCE FORMAT:   Government document (excerpt)

WORD COUNT:  170 words


Article 1, Section 2
Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons.

Article 1, Section 9
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

Article 4, Section 2
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.

CITATION: US Constitution, September 17, 1787, FULL TEXT via National Archives


DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  • Which delegates were more likely to fight in Philadelphia for counting the enslaved as full people for the purposes of apportionment, proslavery delegates or antislavery ones?  How does that complicate how we interpret the meaning of the three-fifths clause?

 

  • Was the proposed federal prohibition of the African slave trade until 1808 a reflection of the strength of the antislavery sentiment in 1787 or the power of the proslavery forces at the convention?

 

  • Unlike the other two clauses discussed here, the so-called fugitive slave clause was part of Article IV.  How might that placement within the structure of the Constitution affect interpretation of its meaning?

FURTHER READING

Our founding ideals of liberty and equality were false when they were written. Black Americans fought to make them true. Without this struggle, America would have no democracy at all. –Nikole Hannah-Jones


2020 MSNBC segment on 1619 Project