2024 Online Instruction

SCHEDULE

 

Wed July 31:  10am to 11am (ZOOM)
Wed Aug 7: 10am to 11am (ZOOM)
MON AUG 12 (updated):  Second close reading due (POSTED PRIVATE)
Wed Aug 14: 10am to 11am (ZOOM)
Wed Aug 21:  11am to 12pm –NOTE CHANGE IN TIME (ZOOM)
FRI AUG 23:  Final Essays due (POSTED PRIVATE)
  • Grades available by email within about a week
  • Transcripts sent by regular mail within about two weeks
  • Prof. Pinsker available for recommendation letters after grades

 

SUMMARY FROM JULY 31 ZOOM:

  • OakesYour next assignment is due on Friday, Aug. 9, a second close reading reflection.  And your final assignment is a comparative essay on the respective reform strategies of Lincoln and Frederick Douglass and the lessons they suggest due by Friday, Aug. 23.  That essay will be the equivalent in length of about two close reading reflections and will require thoughtful secondary source research.  The final essay will be posted online at the same project site and with supporting images, but no video will be required.  Between those two deadlines, and in addition to the weekly Wednesday morning Zoom sessions, you should be reading James Oakes’s book:  The Radical and The Republican, which is the one secondary sources that everyone will need to use in their final essay. We will talk about the book on Aug. 14.

 

  • Zoom sessions are mostly designed to be helpful as check ins and enhanced learning opportunities for research and writing strategies.  But remember the real work is in drafting your assignments and consulting with Prof. Pinsker via email (pinsker@msn.com)

 

  • General writing advice for historical close readings:

 

  • Advice for strong openings:
    • Consider attempting a narrative vignette built around a snippet of quotation
    • Provide brief but effective summary context of the document under study
    • Then pivot to a clear thesis statement that offers an original interpretation about the significance of the author’s writing strategy

 

  • Advice for strong text summaries:
    • Summarize the entire text (or text excerpt) deftly using both paraphrase and snippets of quotation
    • Don’t forget to describe the format of the text
    • Always acknowledge if you are focusing only on an excerpt

 

  • Advice for strong context sections:
    • Good context requires some outside research using high quality secondary sources
    • Judge secondary sources by the expertise of the authors (requires BYLINES) and whether the format has been peer reviewed (requires academic publishing) or at least edited (requires professional publishing)
    • Always start with context information about author and audience and then consider expanding into time period essentials –but always be judicious and don’t overwhelm your analysis with too much context

 

  • Advice for strong subtext analysis:
    • The best way to decode subtext is to consider what’s left out
    • The easiest way to understand what’s missing from a document is by wide-ranging comparison. For example, how is this document different from earlier documents written by the same author? How does it compare to similar documents written during the time period by other authors? What about comparing the document to previous classic documents (such as the Declaration of Sentiments with the Declaration of Independence)?
    • Remember to compare backward in time (not forward).  This is a historical close reading exercise.

 

  • Advice for strong closing arguments:
    • Return to the opening vignette or idea
    • Reframe the original thesis into something thoughtful –don’t just restate it.

 

  • Multi-Media Reminders
    • Don’t forget to include two to three images with captions and clickable credits, expandable (attach to media file) and formatted neatly within paragraphs or between them

 

    • Don’t forget a short document video produced in WeVideo and including clear, well read audio narration, a compelling music track, carefully selected and high quality images, some nice production elements such as call out text or transitions, and a well organized credit slide

SUMMARY FROM AUGUST 7th ZOOM

Reminders for Second Close Reading (due Friday, August 9):

  • Create a new post at the 2024 projects site with CATEGORY = Second Close Reading
  • Include your essay with Chicago-style footnotes and 2-3 captioned and credited images
  • Don’t forget to provide a link to a short document video created in WeVideo and make sure you have EXPORTED the video and are using the public link
  • Prof. Pinsker is available to review drafts by email today or tomorrow (Thursday)
  • Assignments are due posted by 5pm on Friday but you can make changes through the evening.  However, make NO changes to your post after midnight without emailing Prof. Pinsker first.  There will be late penalties assessed for those who do not finish by Friday evening, August 9.
  • Grades and evaluations will be sent by email within about a week

Reading for Wednesday August 14 session:

  • Try to finish reading the entire Oakes biography of Lincoln and Douglass and come to the session with questions that might help organize your final essay
  • We will focus on their three meetings:
    • August 10, 1863
    • August 19, 1864
    • March 4, 1865
  • And we will discuss their arguments over emancipation policy as it evolved from 1861 through 1863

SUMMARY FOR AUGUST 14TH ZOOM

Lincoln and Douglass meetings (Chapter 6: “My Friend Douglass”)

  • August 10, 1863
  • August 19, 1864
  • March 4, 1865

Lincoln 1863

See Other-Lincoln Douglass Debates page for additional background

Chronology of Emancipation:

SUMMARY FOR AUGUST 14th and AUGUST 21st ZOOM

Advice for the final Lincoln-Douglass essay:

“and a final essay (about 2,000 to 2,500 words or roughly 4 to 6 pages) that draws lessons about how best to achieve change in American democracy through comparing and contrasting the antislavery strategies of Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln.”

  • Read the Oakes biography carefully, especially the introduction, the conclusion and any sections which cover any of the documents which you plan to feature.  Think about the differences between radicals and moderates, or between reformers and politicians (as Oakes puts it).  Consider how Lincoln and Douglass differed, and where they converged, and then ask if there’s any insights or lessons from that experience about how best to achieve change in American democracy.

 

  • As always, focus your strongest writing energy on crafting an appealing opening –one that would engage fellow students.  Consider using a narrative vignette or striking statement or epigraph.  Provide essential context and then pivot to an organizing thesis statement that offers a clear interpretation.
  • Example of thesis framework
    • Here is an example from Jordyn Ney’s essay:  “The question thus became who they should appeal to most to ignite change and when they should take action to ensure a positive outcome. Much like today, American politics was a balancing game between when to wait and when to act.”
  • The body of the essay should have a clear structure, reflecting change over time or chronology and a clear sense of research effort.

 

  • Essays should include a descriptive title and sub-headings when helpful, properly captioned and credited images as well as Chicago-style footnotes, citing wherever relevant the primary source texts from the course syllabus as well as any secondary sources provided by the program, most notably James Oakes’s dual biography, The Radical and the Republican (2007).

    • First footnote:  James Oakes, The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 2007), 107.
    • Subsequent footnotes:  Oakes, 212.
  • Always remember to strive for balance:  between seeing the big picture (Lincoln vs. Douglass) and highlighting your leading examples (always focus on just a few moments), between making an argument (your interpretation) and providing the essential background (context necessary for understanding by your readers), and between understanding the past and appreciating its possible insights for the future.

 

  • Practical tips:
    • Remember our debate on the final day of the campus program and feel free to borrow ideas from that exchange
    • Also feel free to use revised material from your earlier close reading essays when relevant
    • Make sure that you use at least a few compelling (and properly captioned and credited) images but do not create videos or other multi-media tools
    • Don’t plagiarize by mis-paraphrasing or by using AI-generated text.

 

  • Try to send or share with Prof. Pinsker drafts (full or partial –and at least of your opening paragraph).  He will read them up to the afternoon of Thursday, August 22.

 

  • Late essays will be penalized up to 5 points per day.  EMAIL Prof. Pinsker on Friday if you need to make ANY changes to your post after midnight on Friday, August 23.