{"id":31,"date":"2021-06-14T19:32:21","date_gmt":"2021-06-14T19:32:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/housedivided.dickinson.edu\/sites\/teagle-ney\/?page_id=31"},"modified":"2021-07-06T20:13:43","modified_gmt":"2021-07-06T20:13:43","slug":"frederick-douglass","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/housedivided.dickinson.edu\/sites\/teagle-ney\/frederick-douglass\/","title":{"rendered":"Frederick Douglass, “Fifth of July” (1852)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Frederick<\/a>

Douglass in 1879 (Library of Congress)<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n

The Fourth of July to the American Slave<\/h1>\n

Frederick Douglass\u2019s \u201cFifth of July\u201d speech<\/a> was perhaps so powerful because he gave it the day after the traditional American holiday celebrating freedom and independence. Douglass\u2019 speech confronted the hypocrisy and irony of the Fourth of July from a slave\u2019s perspective.<\/p>\n

He asked, \u201cWhat to the American Slave, is your 4th of July?\u201d and answered without question that it was a day of \u201cgross injustice and cruelty\u201d to which the slave was the \u201cconstant victim.\u201d He was appalled that Americans did not see or even acknowledge how hypocritical it was to celebrate their freedom while the country’s “great sin\u201d endured.<\/p>\n

Though Douglass never explicitly mentioned the famous phrase from the Declaration’s preamble, \u201call men are created equal,\u201d he spent a significant amount of time explaining why slaves deserved a natural right to freedom. He explained that since men had already conceded that slaves share their manhood, there was no rational basis to deny them equality. In this section of the speech, Douglass tried to appeal to the logic and reason of his white listeners. However, he later conceded that convincing argument was not enough. Instead, he proceeded with \u201cscorching irony\u201d so that he could \u201cpour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke.\u201d This passage reveals that Douglass was not only devoted to his cause, but also angry\u2014 and rightfully so.<\/p>\n

The explicit emotion and resentment made this speech extremely effective. Douglass’ descriptive vocabulary and “fiery” questions demonstrated that he was hurting. Using graphic adjectives such as \u201cgross,\u201d \u201cconstant,\u201d and \u201cscorching,\u201d he created a descriptive reality of what American hypocrisy looked and felt like.<\/p>\n

\"Depiction<\/a>

Depiction of US slave trade, to which Douglass was vehemently opposed (New York Times)<\/p><\/div>\n

What I found most inspiring was his ability to call out Americans\u2019 hypocrisy so perfectly. He made a logical and passionate argument that revealed a deeper meaning behind the Fourth of July. I am sure most white Americans did not entertain the thought that their celebration was hypocritical, but rather saw the day simply as an opportunity to commemorate their freedom. Douglass illustrated their carelessness in a way that made me think more seriously about the importance of making sure America always lives up to its promise of ensuring life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for\u00a0all.<\/i><\/p>\n